Subject	what's your point?
Posted by	KasbeKZ(VA) on February 09, 2011 at 1:27 PM
	This message has been viewed 169 times.
In Reply To	Seriously!? posted by Z_Pilot (GA) on February 09, 2011 at 01:02 PM
Message	information is being shared. the comments make it dramatic.
Follow Ups	Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery - ArubaDave 00:48:40 02/09/11 Yep. Anyone still have those pdfs? Adam? - BoneZ 01:00:05 02/09/11 Congrats on getting the fd! Looks mean! - Pilot.P (NZ) 01:04:15 02/09/11 Yep most Z owners also like the FD's and most Z owners - ArubaDave 01:18:31 02/09/11 Re: Yep most Z owners also like the FD's and most Z owners - Pilot.P (NZ) 04:19:44 02/09/11 im another Z owner that hates the Supra... ugly ass car. (n/m) - TeddyZ(SFC) 14:42:44 02/09/11 Yours looks better. (n/m) - Musashi Sword 01:08:51 02/09/11 i agree, yours looks better - jzx 01:12:25 02/09/11 it's amazing to me that they find that acceptable (n/m) - KasbeKZ(VA) 01:13:51 02/09/11 no contest... GZA part is WAY Better... - TeddyZ(SFC) 01:34:14 02/09/11 Yours looks better by far who ever is doing the engraving on - 5280Z_nightstalker 01:39:41 02/09/11 i dont think it's engraved it looks stamped. (n/m) - TeddyZ(SFC) 01:46:36 02/09/11 The copy looks like crap... Good job with the rx7 - JonnyZ(SoCal) 01:55:58 02/09/11 It never ends. Sorry to see this Dave (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 05:57:24 02/09/11 Still have yours on since my 1st car was NA. It's alive and - RAGTPZ 06:18:31 02/09/11 Side by side yours are far and away better looking, a good - SilverZXTT(CO) 06:32:37 02/09/11 copying.. you also refering to the 2 cars in his sig? ;) - Rogy 15:20:04 02/09/11 goes to show you that creativity is not something you can - Cap927(Boston) 08:56:48 02/09/11 One of the few cars I'd take over a Z32. Good luck with it! (n/m) - TTFairladyZ 10:18:33 02/09/11 Who are the copies by? (n/m) - rojoloco (San Diego) 10:38:53 02/09/11 I'm gussing Z1. - Halo TTZ 11:31:15 02/09/11 You'll throw your back out if you Guss too much. - ni[X]it 11:38:17 02/09/11 the Firewall at work blocks photo bucket, ect.. - Halo TTZ 11:43:07 02/09/11 and good grammar as well. :) (n/m) - Milo (SATX) 12:09:05 02/09/11 yes. (n/m) - Halo TTZ 12:17:23 02/09/11 Still waiting for those archives to become public. - rojoloco (San Diego) 13:24:01 02/09/11 I can discribe some of it pretty easily. - ni[X]it 13:57:15 02/09/11 I like the copyright. lol - rojoloco (San Diego) 14:59:44 02/09/11 When was this discovered??? (n/m) - blackomega 11:13:09 02/10/11 interesting...is that a product description page because - gizmo 12:06:59 02/09/11 WOW...they took that page down awful fast. (n/m) - gizmo 12:23:26 02/09/11 WOW is right. ridiculous. (n/m) - KasbeKZ(VA) 12:54:11 02/09/11 Yeah, I just tried to see it but it is too late. (n/m) - rojoloco (San Diego) 13:24:35 02/09/11 i still see the page and it does seem like GZA Bashing.. - TeddyZ(SFC) 13:04:20 02/09/11 you're right...Halo's link doesnt take you there any longer (n/m) - gizmo 13:09:28 02/09/11 weird, it was right off their Z32 front page in the "New Pro - Halo TTZ 13:16:42 02/09/11 that link seems to work (n/m) - sfarrah 14:07:21 02/09/11 not any more... "product not found" (n/m) - TeddyZ(SFC) 14:26:11 02/09/11 No worries. Carlos "archived" it. - rojoloco (San Diego) 14:55:22 02/09/11 there is so much douchery in that passage... - KasbeKZ(VA) 12:09:11 02/09/11 probably because it's written by Russel - Kennymonster 13:15:03 02/09/11 I had a feeling that was the vendor. (n/m) - rojoloco (San Diego) 13:28:19 02/09/11 all I see is 'Product not found!' (n/m) - moxie (SF) 15:04:54 02/09/11 Here's the bashing ad. - SeedyROM 16:46:24 02/09/11 wow just wow (n/m) - ztunerz 17:52:46 02/09/11 wtf...man some of those guys over there are idiots - collegeboy 19:17:32 02/09/11 That ad description was not meant to sell the product.. - ForceFedTT (SoCal) 06:18:38 02/10/11 It's childish, pathetic, and unprofessional. (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 08:23:15 02/10/11 ...but just by being infamous, it will. - ZiNnYc 09:08:07 02/10/11 taken down, it wasn't meant to advertise for Z1. (n/m) - Cap927(Boston) 11:36:21 02/10/11 Cool. - ForceFedTT (SoCal) 15:25:50 02/10/11 no worries, I didn't take it that way. Your comment just .. - Cap927(Boston) 09:42:33 02/11/11 Certainly some interesting tabs open in your brower :) (n/m) - TTFairladyZ 10:16:46 02/10/11 That is NOT my image/browser. It's copied from an above post - SeedyROM 11:17:56 02/10/11 wild guess.. - Cap927(Boston) 12:02:11 02/09/11 screen shot for posterity, nice. (n/m) - zgene4 12:58:18 02/09/11 Talk about an unprofessional product description! (n/m) - rojoloco (San Diego) 13:41:03 02/09/11 What a bunch of dicks. - SeedyROM 16:40:32 02/09/11 To think I was about to start taking it easy on them. - rojoloco (San Diego) 18:36:42 02/09/11 paint ftw! (n/m) - nemo1080 (Iowa) 20:23:14 02/09/11 Seriously!? - Z_Pilot (GA) 13:02:55 02/09/11 here's comes Tarzan...... - gizmo 13:11:41 02/09/11 what's your point? - KasbeKZ(VA) 13:27:33 02/09/11 Looking at his profile explains his comment. (n/m) - Spongerider :) 14:23:05 02/09/11 I'm surprise he doesn't add "Z1 knee pads" to his profile (n/m) - Cap927(Boston) 14:50:07 02/09/11 My thoughts were along that line as well.... ;) (n/m) - Gold Z 15:08:43 02/09/11 third try is a charm. took me that many looks to get that (n/m) - KasbeKZ(VA) 21:31:26 02/09/11 Repercussion to your whistleblower emails. Sorry to see. (n/m) - ZiNnYc 14:17:47 02/09/11 Funny to see no comments from Z1 on this subject - Dream Z 15:07:08 02/09/11 That was not the entire screenshot though... - rockchucker 15:56:35 02/09/11 ni[x]it better be careful. - rojoloco (San Diego) 18:31:54 02/09/11 Somebody should rip off and undersell the Z1 throttle bodies - MrOzzie5183 16:10:39 02/09/11 At one point I think the manufacture of them did and Z1 got - nissanguyz32 17:08:09 02/09/11 who is the manufacturer? (n/m) - blackomega 11:22:36 02/10/11 I dont remember the details. - nissanguyz32 11:53:20 02/10/11 the throttle bodies look like that are missing the AMS logo - Halo TTZ 17:23:28 02/09/11 That fixes everything. (n/m) - dpjax 07:36:39 02/10/11 Wow, seeing that description is def unproffesional - Z32TT-R 01:07:14 02/10/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.